wip

src/routes/articles/Image.svelte

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+<script lang="ts">
+	export let paths: string[] = [];
+	export let caption: string = '';
+</script>
+
+<div class="container">
+		{#each paths as path (path)}
+			<img src={path} alt="" />
+		{/each}
+</div>
+
+<style>
+	.container {
+        width: fit-content;
+        margin-left: auto;
+        margin-right: auto;
+		background-color: #1d2021;
+		padding: 1em;
+		border: 1px solid #928374;
+		border-radius: 2px;
+		display: flex; /* Arrange images horizontally */
+		/* Removed flex properties from here */
+        gap: 1em;
+	}
+
+</style>

src/routes/articles/the-graphics-pipeline/+page.svx

@@ -3,6 +3,10 @@ title: The Graphics Pipeline
 date: "April 20 - 2025"
 ---
 
+<script>
+import Image from "../Image.svelte"
+</script>
+
 Ever wondered how games put all that gore on your display? All that beauty is brought into life by
 a process called **rendering**, and at the heart of it, is the **graphics pipeline**.
 In this article we'll dive deep into  the intricate details of this beast.
@@ -25,6 +29,11 @@ stage and have a recap afterwards to demystify this 4-stage division.
 
 Ever been jump-scared by this sight in an FPS? Why are things rendered like that?
 
+<Image 
+    paths={["/images/boo.png"]} 
+/> 
+
+
 In order to display a scene (like a murder scene), 
 we need to have a way of **representing** the **surface** of the composing objects (like corpses) in computer-memory.
 We only care about the **surface** since we won't be seeing the insides anyways---Not that we want to.
@@ -40,36 +49,41 @@ For instance, **NURB surfaces** are great for representing **curves**
 and it's all about the **high-precision** needed to do **CAD**.
 We could also do **ray-tracing** using fancy equations for rendering **photo-realistic** images.
 
-
 These are all great--ignoring the fact that they would take an eternity to process...
 But what we need is a **performant** approach that can do this for an entire scene with
 hundereds of thousands of objects (like a lot of corpses) in under a small fraction of a second. What we need is **polygonal modeling**.
 
-
 **Polygonal modeling** enables us to do an exciting thing called **real-time rendering**. The idea is that we only need an
 **approximation** of a surface to render it **realisticly-enough** for us to have some fun killing time!
 We can achieve this approximation using a collection of **triangles**, **lines** and **dots** (primitives),
 which themselves are composed of a series of **vertices** (points in space).
 
+<Image 
+    paths={["/images/polygon_sphere.webp"]} 
+/> 
 
 A **vertex** is simply a point in space.
 Once we get enough of these **points**, we can conncet them to form **primitives** such as **triangles**, **lines** and **dots**.
 And once we connect enough of these **primitives** together, they form a **model** or a **mesh** (that we need for our corpse).
 With some interesting models put together, we can compose a **scene** (like a murder scene :D).
 
+<Image 
+    paths={["/images/bunny.png"]} 
+/> 
 
 But let's not get ahead of ourselves. The primary type of **primitive** that we care about during **polygonal modeling**
 is a **triangle**. But why not squares or polygons with variable number of edges?
 
 ## Why Triangles?
 
+
 In **Euclidean geometry**, triangles are always **planar** (they exist only in one plane), 
 any polygon composed of more than 3 points may break this rule, but why does polygons residing in one plane so important 
 to us?
 
-
-Being non-planar makes it rather difficult to determine 
-
+<Image 
+    paths={["/images/planar.jpg", "/images/non_planar_1.jpg", "/images/non_planar_2.png"]} 
+/> 
 
 When a polygon exists only in one plane, we can safely imply that **only one face** of it can be visible
 at any one time, this enables us to utilize a huge optimization technique called **back-face culling**.